Armenia vs Burundi: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central)

Armenia
1,821 million SLC
in 2022
Burundi
1,419 million SLC
in 2019
Armenia rank
16th
Burundi rank
19th

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) over time

  • Armenia
  • Burundi
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k200920152022

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 1,821 million SLC against 1,419 million SLC in Burundi, a difference of 402 million SLC.

That makes Armenia's figure about 1.3 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 16th and Burundi ranks 19th of 70 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central), Armenia or Burundi?
Armenia, at 1,821 million SLC against 1,419 million SLC in Burundi as of 2022.
What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) between Armenia and Burundi?
402 million SLC, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Burundi?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Armenia and Burundi rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
Armenia ranks 16th and Burundi ranks 19th of 70 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Burundi: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-recurrent-central-government-expenditure-value/armenia/burundi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-recurrent-central-government-expenditure-value/armenia/burundi/">Armenia vs Burundi: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
72 places, 873 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.