Chad vs Russian Federation: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) over time
- Chad
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 12,046 million SLC against 2,382 million SLC in Chad, a difference of 9,664 million SLC.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 5.1 times Chad's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 11th and Russian Federation ranks 8th of 70 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,121 million SLC | 9,732 million SLC | 7,611 million SLC | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 2,382 million SLC | 11,822 million SLC | 9,439 million SLC | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central), Chad or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 12,046 million SLC against 2,382 million SLC in Chad as of 2021.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) between Chad and Russian Federation?
- 9,664 million SLC, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Russian Federation?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Chad and Russian Federation rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
- Chad ranks 11th and Russian Federation ranks 8th of 70 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.