Chile vs Uganda: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) over time
- Chile
- Uganda
How they compare
Chile currently reports 224,786 million SLC against 73,841 million SLC in Uganda, a difference of 150,945 million SLC.
That makes Chile's figure about 3.0 times Uganda's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 2nd and Uganda ranks 4th of 70 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central), Chile or Uganda?
- Chile, at 224,786 million SLC against 73,841 million SLC in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) between Chile and Uganda?
- 150,945 million SLC, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Uganda rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
- Chile ranks 2nd and Uganda ranks 4th of 70 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.