Dominican Republic vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 798.49 million SLC against 682 million SLC in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 116.49 million SLC.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.2 times Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 23rd and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 24th of 70 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 838.67 million SLC | 703.86 million SLC | 134.81 million SLC | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 1,428 million SLC | 637 million SLC | 790.84 million SLC | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central), Dominican Republic or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- Dominican Republic, at 798.49 million SLC against 682 million SLC in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) between Dominican Republic and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 116.49 million SLC, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 23rd and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 24th of 70 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.