Italy vs Poland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) over time
- Italy
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 408 million SLC against 373 million SLC in Italy, a difference of 35 million SLC.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Poland ahead.
Italy ranks 28th and Poland ranks 27th of 70 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 343.86 million SLC | 345.51 million SLC | 1.66 million SLC | Poland |
| 2020s | 344.75 million SLC | 338.32 million SLC | 6.43 million SLC | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central), Italy or Poland?
- Poland, at 408 million SLC against 373 million SLC in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) between Italy and Poland?
- 35 million SLC, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Poland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Poland rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
- Italy ranks 28th and Poland ranks 27th of 70 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.