Costa Rica vs Russian Federation: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (general)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (general) over time
- Costa Rica
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 31,630 million SLC against 26,690 million SLC in Costa Rica, a difference of 4,940 million SLC.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 3rd of 43 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23,942 million SLC | 23,471 million SLC | 471.06 million SLC | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 26,690 million SLC | 27,343 million SLC | 653.3 million SLC | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (general), Costa Rica or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 31,630 million SLC against 26,690 million SLC in Costa Rica as of 2021.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (general) between Costa Rica and Russian Federation?
- 4,940 million SLC, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Russian Federation?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Russian Federation rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (general)?
- Costa Rica ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 3rd of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.