Dominican Republic vs Poland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (general)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (general) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Poland
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 897.51 million SLC against 508.65 million SLC in Poland, a difference of 388.86 million SLC.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.8 times Poland's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 19th and Poland ranks 21st of 43 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,558 million SLC | 415.41 million SLC | 1,143 million SLC | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 2,442 million SLC | 412.58 million SLC | 2,030 million SLC | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (general), Dominican Republic or Poland?
- Dominican Republic, at 897.51 million SLC against 508.65 million SLC in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (general) between Dominican Republic and Poland?
- 388.86 million SLC, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Poland rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (general)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 19th and Poland ranks 21st of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.