Australia vs Latvia: Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita
Australia
0.0091 t per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0091 t per person
in 2024
Australia rank
34th
Latvia rank
35th
Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.0091 t per person against 0.0091 t per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 t per person.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 35th of 167 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.012 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0117 t per person | Australia |
| 2000s | 0.0167 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0165 t per person | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.0116 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0112 t per person | Australia |
| 2020s | 0.0118 t per person | 0.0042 t per person | 0.0076 t per person | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita, Australia or Latvia?
- Australia, at 0.0091 t per person against 0.0091 t per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita between Australia and Latvia?
- 0 t per person, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita?
- Australia ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 35th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pulp for paper — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.