Greenland vs Pakistan: Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita
Greenland
0.0011 t per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Greenland rank
71st
Pakistan rank
73rd
Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Greenland
- Pakistan
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 0.0011 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0003 t per person.
That makes Greenland's figure about 1.3 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Pakistan ahead.
Greenland ranks 71st and Pakistan ranks 73rd of 167 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0009 t per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita, Greenland or Pakistan?
- Greenland, at 0.0011 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita between Greenland and Pakistan?
- 0.0003 t per person, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Pakistan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Greenland and Pakistan rank globally for pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita?
- Greenland ranks 71st and Pakistan ranks 73rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pulp for paper — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.