Japan vs Latvia: Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita
Japan
0.0088 t per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0091 t per person
in 2024
Japan rank
36th
Latvia rank
35th
Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Japan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0091 t per person against 0.0088 t per person in Japan, a difference of 0.0003 t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 36th and Latvia ranks 35th of 167 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0255 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0252 t per person | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.0178 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0177 t per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.0131 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0127 t per person | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.0103 t per person | 0.0042 t per person | 0.0061 t per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita, Japan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0091 t per person against 0.0088 t per person in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita between Japan and Latvia?
- 0.0003 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Latvia rank globally for pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita?
- Japan ranks 36th and Latvia ranks 35th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pulp for paper — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.