Jordan vs Tunisia: Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita
Jordan
0.0124 t per person
in 2024
Tunisia
0.012 t per person
in 2024
Jordan rank
24th
Tunisia rank
27th
Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Jordan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.0124 t per person against 0.012 t per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0004 t per person.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.
Jordan ranks 24th and Tunisia ranks 27th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0048 t per person | 0.0052 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.009 t per person | 0.0077 t per person | 0.0013 t per person | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.0107 t per person | 0.0098 t per person | 0.0009 t per person | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.0097 t per person | 0.009 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita, Jordan or Tunisia?
- Jordan, at 0.0124 t per person against 0.012 t per person in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita between Jordan and Tunisia?
- 0.0004 t per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tunisia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Tunisia rank globally for pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita?
- Jordan ranks 24th and Tunisia ranks 27th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pulp for paper — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.