Libya vs Mongolia: Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita
Libya
0.0005 t per person
in 2024
Mongolia
0.0006 t per person
in 2024
Libya rank
80th
Mongolia rank
79th
Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Libya
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.0006 t per person against 0.0005 t per person in Libya, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 80th and Mongolia ranks 79th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.0006 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.0003 t per person | 0.001 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita, Libya or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.0006 t per person against 0.0005 t per person in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita between Libya and Mongolia?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mongolia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Mongolia rank globally for pulp for paper — import quantity, per capita?
- Libya ranks 80th and Mongolia ranks 79th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pulp for paper — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.