Which has higher pulp for paper — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Cambodia or Central African Republic?

Central African Republic, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Cambodia as of 2024.

What is the difference in pulp for paper — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Cambodia and Central African Republic?

0 t per US$ of GDP, with Central African Republic ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Central African Republic?

22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cambodia vs Central African Republic: Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP

Cambodia

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Central African Republic

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Cambodia rank

54th

Central African Republic rank

52nd

Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time

Cambodia
Central African Republic

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Cambodia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 54th and Central African Republic ranks 52nd of 167 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cambodia	Central African Republic	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Central African Republic
2010s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Central African Republic
2020s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pulp for paper — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Cambodia or Central African Republic?: Central African Republic, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Cambodia as of 2024.
What is the difference in pulp for paper — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Cambodia and Central African Republic?: 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Central African Republic?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Cambodia and Central African Republic rank globally for pulp for paper — import quantity, per unit of gdp?: Cambodia ranks 54th and Central African Republic ranks 52nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Central African Republic: Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/pulp-for-paper-import-quantity-per-unit-of-gdp/cambodia/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/pulp-for-paper-import-quantity-per-unit-of-gdp/cambodia/central-african-republic/">Cambodia vs Central African Republic: Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
Unit: t per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 6,438 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 August 2026

Pulp for paper — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.