Luxembourg vs Malta: Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
Luxembourg
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malta
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
147th
Malta rank
146th
Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Luxembourg
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 147th and Malta ranks 146th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulp for paper — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Luxembourg or Malta?
- Malta, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pulp for paper — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Luxembourg and Malta?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Malta?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Malta rank globally for pulp for paper — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Luxembourg ranks 147th and Malta ranks 146th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pulp for paper — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.