Papua New Guinea vs Sudan: Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
Papua New Guinea
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sudan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
145th
Sudan rank
148th
Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Sudan
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 145th and Sudan ranks 148th of 167 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulp for paper — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Papua New Guinea or Sudan?
- Papua New Guinea, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pulp for paper — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Papua New Guinea and Sudan?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Sudan rank globally for pulp for paper — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 145th and Sudan ranks 148th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pulp for paper — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.