Kazakhstan vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate

Kazakhstan
167.26 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
16.71 % change on previous year
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
10th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th

Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-2000200400600800196919962024

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 167.26 % change on previous year against 16.71 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 150.55 % change on previous year.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 10.0 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s -33.33 % change on previous year 25.68 % change on previous year 59.01 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 64.43 % change on previous year 1.01 % change on previous year 63.42 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
2010s 9.97 % change on previous year 15.87 % change on previous year 5.9 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 67.2 % change on previous year 25.63 % change on previous year 41.57 % change on previous year Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate, Kazakhstan or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Kazakhstan, at 167.26 % change on previous year against 16.71 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate between Kazakhstan and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
150.55 % change on previous year, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate?
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/pulp-for-paper-import-value-annual-growth-rate/kazakhstan/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/pulp-for-paper-import-value-annual-growth-rate/kazakhstan/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Kazakhstan vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
234 places, 8,948 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Pulp for paper — Import value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.