Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mauritania: Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
16.71 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mauritania
297.18 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
Mauritania rank
7th

Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Mauritania
-2000200400600800196919962024

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 297.18 % change on previous year against 16.71 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 280.47 % change on previous year.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 17.8 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Mauritania ranks 7th of 42 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s -25.71 % change on previous year -50 % change on previous year 24.29 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1.3 % change on previous year 35.01 % change on previous year 33.71 % change on previous year Mauritania
2010s 15.88 % change on previous year -8.33 % change on previous year 24.22 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 25.63 % change on previous year 298.21 % change on previous year 272.58 % change on previous year Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 297.18 % change on previous year against 16.71 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mauritania?
280.47 % change on previous year, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mauritania?
23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mauritania rank globally for pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Mauritania ranks 7th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mauritania: Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/pulp-for-paper-import-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/pulp-for-paper-import-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mauritania/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mauritania: Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
234 places, 8,948 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Pulp for paper — Import value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.