Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mongolia: Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
16.71 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mongolia
329.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
Mongolia rank
6th

Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Mongolia
0200400600800196919962024

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 329.01 % change on previous year against 16.71 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 312.3 % change on previous year.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 19.7 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Mongolia ranks 6th of 42 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s 32.19 % change on previous year -24.87 % change on previous year 57.06 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 7.72 % change on previous year -2.22 % change on previous year 9.94 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 15.87 % change on previous year 152.53 % change on previous year 136.66 % change on previous year Mongolia
2020s 25.63 % change on previous year 59.23 % change on previous year 33.6 % change on previous year Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 329.01 % change on previous year against 16.71 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mongolia?
312.3 % change on previous year, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mongolia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mongolia rank globally for pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Mongolia ranks 6th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mongolia: Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/pulp-for-paper-import-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/pulp-for-paper-import-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mongolia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mongolia: Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
234 places, 8,948 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Pulp for paper — Import value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.