Libya vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate

Libya
67.22 % change on previous year
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.91 % change on previous year
in 2024
Libya rank
15th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
18th

Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate over time

  • Libya
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0200400196919962024

How they compare

Libya currently reports 67.22 % change on previous year against 2.91 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 64.31 % change on previous year.

That makes Libya's figure about 23.1 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Libya ranks 15th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 10.03 % change on previous year 27.29 % change on previous year 17.26 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 8.02 % change on previous year 9.26 % change on previous year 1.24 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 7.43 % change on previous year 18.08 % change on previous year 10.65 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 36.21 % change on previous year 15.07 % change on previous year 21.15 % change on previous year Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate, Libya or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Libya, at 67.22 % change on previous year against 2.91 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate between Libya and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
64.31 % change on previous year, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Libya and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for pulp for paper — import value, annual growth rate?
Libya ranks 15th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/pulp-for-paper-import-value-annual-growth-rate/libya/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/pulp-for-paper-import-value-annual-growth-rate/libya/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Libya vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pulp for paper — Import value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
234 places, 8,948 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Pulp for paper — Import value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.