Eritrea vs Malta: Pulp for paper — Import value, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Malta
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
145th
Malta rank
144th
Pulp for paper — Import value, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Eritrea, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 145th and Malta ranks 144th of 167 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulp for paper — import value, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Malta?
- Malta, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pulp for paper — import value, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Malta?
- 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Malta rank globally for pulp for paper — import value, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 145th and Malta ranks 144th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pulp for paper — Import value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pulp for paper — Import value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.