Cabo Verde vs United Republic of Tanzania: R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)

Cabo Verde
75.84 million SLC
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
10,767 million SLC
in 2024
Cabo Verde rank
1st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
1st

R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k200220132024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 10,767 million SLC against 75.84 million SLC in Cabo Verde, a difference of 10,691 million SLC.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 142.0 times Cabo Verde's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Cabo Verde ahead.

Cabo Verde ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 1 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 237.02 million SLC 3,496 million SLC 3,259 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 75.84 million SLC 3,095 million SLC 3,019 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Cabo Verde or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 10,767 million SLC against 75.84 million SLC in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
What is the difference in r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania?
10,691 million SLC, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania?
8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
Cabo Verde ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 1 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs United Republic of Tanzania: R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local/cabo-verde-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local/cabo-verde-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Cabo Verde vs United Republic of Tanzania: R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
52 places, 608 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.