Egypt vs Iceland: R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Egypt
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 7,398 million SLC against 6,141 million SLC in Egypt, a difference of 1,257 million SLC.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Egypt's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 9th and Iceland ranks 7th of 49 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,286 million SLC | 5,574 million SLC | 3,288 million SLC | Iceland |
| 2020s | 4,225 million SLC | 6,515 million SLC | 2,290 million SLC | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Egypt or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 7,398 million SLC against 6,141 million SLC in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Egypt and Iceland?
- 1,257 million SLC, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iceland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Iceland rank globally for r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Egypt ranks 9th and Iceland ranks 7th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.