Egypt vs Lebanon: R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Egypt
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 17,387 million SLC against 6,141 million SLC in Egypt, a difference of 11,246 million SLC.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 2.8 times Egypt's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 9th and Lebanon ranks 6th of 49 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,330 million SLC | 11,437 million SLC | 9,107 million SLC | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 3,404 million SLC | 14,644 million SLC | 11,239 million SLC | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Egypt or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 17,387 million SLC against 6,141 million SLC in Egypt as of 2021.
- What is the difference in r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Egypt and Lebanon?
- 11,246 million SLC, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Lebanon?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Egypt and Lebanon rank globally for r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Egypt ranks 9th and Lebanon ranks 6th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.