South Africa vs Ukraine: R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- South Africa
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 2,124 million SLC against 1,717 million SLC in South Africa, a difference of 407 million SLC.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 17th and Ukraine ranks 14th of 49 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,387 million SLC | 988.86 million SLC | 397.86 million SLC | South Africa |
| 2020s | 1,530 million SLC | 1,526 million SLC | 3.22 million SLC | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), South Africa or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 2,124 million SLC against 1,717 million SLC in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between South Africa and Ukraine?
- 407 million SLC, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Ukraine?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do South Africa and Ukraine rank globally for r&d agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- South Africa ranks 17th and Ukraine ranks 14th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.