Albania vs China: Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)
Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) over time
- Albania
- China
How they compare
Albania currently reports 1.5 km against 1.2 km in China, a difference of 0.3 km.
That makes Albania's figure about 1.2 times China's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Albania has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 46th and China ranks 47th of 83 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area), Albania or China?
- Albania, at 1.5 km against 1.2 km in China as of 2009.
- What is the difference in rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) between Albania and China?
- 0.3 km, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and China?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Albania and China rank globally for rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)?
- Albania ranks 46th and China ranks 47th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.