Bangladesh vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)

Bangladesh
1.9 km
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 km
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
38th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
36th

Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
00.511.52200020092019

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2 km against 1.9 km in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.1 km.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 38th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 36th of 83 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
2000s 1.89 km 1.98 km 0.09 km Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1.9 km 1.88 km 0.02 km Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area), Bangladesh or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2 km against 1.9 km in Bangladesh as of 2019.
What is the difference in rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) between Bangladesh and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
0.1 km, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
How do Bangladesh and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)?
Bangladesh ranks 38th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 36th of 83 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/rail-lines-density-total-route-in-km-per-100-square-km-of-land-area-value/bangladesh/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/rail-lines-density-total-route-in-km-per-100-square-km-of-land-area-value/bangladesh/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Bangladesh vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) — Value
Unit
km
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
110 places, 1,918 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.