Bosnia and Herzegovina vs India: Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)
Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 2.1 km against 2 km in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.1 km.
That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was India ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 36th and India ranks 35th of 83 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and India in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.98 km | 1.9 km | 0.08 km | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 1.88 km | 2.01 km | 0.13 km | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area), Bosnia and Herzegovina or India?
- India, at 2.1 km against 2 km in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2021.
- What is the difference in rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and India?
- 0.1 km, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and India?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and India rank globally for rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 36th and India ranks 35th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.