Eastern Asia vs Viet Nam: Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)
Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) over time
- Eastern Asia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Eastern Asia currently reports 1.2 km against 1 km in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.2 km.
That makes Eastern Asia's figure about 1.2 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Eastern Asia ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 18 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eastern Asia averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.74 km | 0.91 km | 0.17 km | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 0.97 km | 0.78 km | 0.19 km | Eastern Asia |
| 2020s | 1.15 km | 1 km | 0.15 km | Eastern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area), Eastern Asia or Viet Nam?
- Eastern Asia, at 1.2 km against 1 km in Viet Nam as of 2021.
- What is the difference in rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) between Eastern Asia and Viet Nam?
- 0.2 km, with Eastern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Viet Nam?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Eastern Asia and Viet Nam rank globally for rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)?
- Eastern Asia ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 18 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.