Ireland vs Sri Lanka: Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)
Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) over time
- Ireland
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 2.4 km against 2.3 km in Ireland, a difference of 0.1 km.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 32nd and Sri Lanka ranks 31st of 83 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.7 km | 2.2 km | 0.5 km | Ireland |
| 2010s | 2.68 km | 2.17 km | 0.5 km | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area), Ireland or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 2.4 km against 2.3 km in Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) between Ireland and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1 km, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Sri Lanka?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Ireland and Sri Lanka rank globally for rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)?
- Ireland ranks 32nd and Sri Lanka ranks 31st of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.