Türkiye vs Western Europe: Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)
Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) over time
- Türkiye
- Western Europe
How they compare
Western Europe currently reports 6.6 km against 1.3 km in Türkiye, a difference of 5.3 km.
That makes Western Europe's figure about 5.1 times Türkiye's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Western Europe has been ahead every year.
Türkiye ranks 2nd and Western Europe ranks 1st of 9 countries.
Western Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Türkiye | Western Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.11 km | 7.27 km | 6.16 km | Western Europe |
| 2010s | 1.26 km | 7.09 km | 5.83 km | Western Europe |
| 2020s | 1.3 km | 6.6 km | 5.3 km | Western Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area), Türkiye or Western Europe?
- Western Europe, at 6.6 km against 1.3 km in Türkiye as of 2021.
- What is the difference in rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) between Türkiye and Western Europe?
- 5.3 km, with Western Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and Western Europe?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Türkiye and Western Europe rank globally for rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area)?
- Türkiye ranks 2nd and Western Europe ranks 1st of 9 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rail lines density (total route in km per 100 square km of land area) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.