Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Slovenia: Recovered paper — Production, annual growth rate

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.7834 % change on previous year
in 2024
Slovenia
223.41 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
8th
Slovenia rank
1st

Recovered paper — Production, annual growth rate over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Slovenia
-1000100200197720002024

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 223.41 % change on previous year against 0.7834 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 222.63 % change on previous year.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 285.2 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Slovenia ranks 1st of 28 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Slovenia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 25.69 % change on previous year -1.87 % change on previous year 27.56 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 4.6 % change on previous year -8.87 % change on previous year 13.47 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 15.18 % change on previous year 7.64 % change on previous year 7.55 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s -0.5954 % change on previous year 19.21 % change on previous year 19.8 % change on previous year Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher recovered paper — production, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 223.41 % change on previous year against 0.7834 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in recovered paper — production, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Slovenia?
222.63 % change on previous year, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Slovenia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Slovenia rank globally for recovered paper — production, annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Slovenia ranks 1st of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Recovered paper — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Slovenia: Recovered paper — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/recovered-paper-production-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/recovered-paper-production-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/slovenia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Slovenia: Recovered paper — Production, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Recovered paper — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 7,191 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Recovered paper — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.