China vs Latvia: Recovered paper — Production, per capita
China
0.052 t per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0402 t per person
in 2024
China rank
31st
Latvia rank
34th
Recovered paper — Production, per capita over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 0.052 t per person against 0.0402 t per person in Latvia, a difference of 0.0118 t per person.
That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was China ahead.
China ranks 31st and Latvia ranks 34th of 125 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0093 t per person | 0.0091 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | China |
| 2000s | 0.0184 t per person | 0.0271 t per person | 0.0087 t per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0372 t per person | 0.0411 t per person | 0.0039 t per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0483 t per person | 0.0442 t per person | 0.0041 t per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher recovered paper — production, per capita, China or Latvia?
- China, at 0.052 t per person against 0.0402 t per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in recovered paper — production, per capita between China and Latvia?
- 0.0118 t per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for recovered paper — production, per capita?
- China ranks 31st and Latvia ranks 34th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Recovered paper — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Recovered paper — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.