Eswatini vs Nicaragua: Recovered paper — Production, per capita
Eswatini
0.0048 t per person
in 2024
Nicaragua
0.0051 t per person
in 2023
Eswatini rank
76th
Nicaragua rank
74th
Recovered paper — Production, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0.0051 t per person against 0.0048 t per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0003 t per person.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 76th and Nicaragua ranks 74th of 125 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0055 t per person | 0.0019 t per person | 0.0036 t per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.0053 t per person | 0.0049 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.005 t per person | 0.0052 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher recovered paper — production, per capita, Eswatini or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 0.0051 t per person against 0.0048 t per person in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in recovered paper — production, per capita between Eswatini and Nicaragua?
- 0.0003 t per person, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nicaragua?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Nicaragua rank globally for recovered paper — production, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 76th and Nicaragua ranks 74th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Recovered paper — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Recovered paper — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.