Mauritius vs Namibia: Recovered paper — Production, per capita
Mauritius
0.0076 t per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.0066 t per person
in 2024
Mauritius rank
63rd
Namibia rank
65th
Recovered paper — Production, per capita over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.0076 t per person against 0.0066 t per person in Namibia, a difference of 0.001 t per person.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 63rd and Namibia ranks 65th of 125 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0025 t per person | 0.0036 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.0057 t per person | 0.0065 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.0076 t per person | 0.0069 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher recovered paper — production, per capita, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 0.0076 t per person against 0.0066 t per person in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in recovered paper — production, per capita between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 0.001 t per person, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for recovered paper — production, per capita?
- Mauritius ranks 63rd and Namibia ranks 65th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Recovered paper — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Recovered paper — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.