Iceland vs Luxembourg: Recovered paper — Production, per unit of GDP
Iceland
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Luxembourg
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iceland rank
72nd
Luxembourg rank
74th
Recovered paper — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Iceland
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Iceland ranks 72nd and Luxembourg ranks 74th of 125 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher recovered paper — production, per unit of gdp, Iceland or Luxembourg?
- Iceland, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in recovered paper — production, per unit of gdp between Iceland and Luxembourg?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Luxembourg rank globally for recovered paper — production, per unit of gdp?
- Iceland ranks 72nd and Luxembourg ranks 74th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Recovered paper — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Recovered paper — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.