China vs Latvia: Republic of Korea — Industrial roundwood, coniferous (export/import)
Republic of Korea — Industrial roundwood, coniferous (export/import) over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 2,000 m3 against 1,921 m3 in China, a difference of 79 m3.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Latvia ahead.
China ranks 14th and Latvia ranks 13th of 29 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher republic of korea — industrial roundwood, coniferous (export/import), China or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 2,000 m3 against 1,921 m3 in China as of 2017.
- What is the difference in republic of korea — industrial roundwood, coniferous (export/import) between China and Latvia?
- 79 m3, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2017.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for republic of korea — industrial roundwood, coniferous (export/import)?
- China ranks 14th and Latvia ranks 13th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Republic of Korea — Industrial roundwood, coniferous (export/import) — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The database contains data on the bilateral trade flows in roundwood, primary wood and paper products for all countries and territories in the world. The main types of primary forest products included in are: roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, pulp, and paper and paperboard. These products are detailed further. The definitions are available. More detailed information on wood products, including definitions, can be found at: https://www.fao.org/forestry/statistics/80572/en/