Australia and New Zealand vs Mauritania: Reservoir minimum water area change
Australia and New Zealand
-0.8%
in 2022
Mauritania
-2.2%
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
131st
Mauritania rank
134th
Reservoir minimum water area change over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Mauritania
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports -0.8% against -2.2% in Mauritania, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 131st and Mauritania ranks 134th of 153 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -3.1% | -0.9% | 2.2% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 3.1% | 0.9% | 2.2% | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | -0.1% | -1.1% | 1.0% | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reservoir minimum water area change, Australia and New Zealand or Mauritania?
- Australia and New Zealand, at -0.8% against -2.2% in Mauritania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in reservoir minimum water area change between Australia and New Zealand and Mauritania?
- 1.4%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Mauritania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Mauritania rank globally for reservoir minimum water area change?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 131st and Mauritania ranks 134th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Reservoir minimum water area change (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.