Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Reservoir minimum water area

Australia and New Zealand
4,285
in 2022
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
46,508
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
10th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
4th

Reservoir minimum water area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k200020112022

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 46,508 against 4,285 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 42,223.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 10.9 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 219 countries.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 4,186 39,790 35,604 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2010s 4,455 46,131 41,675 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 4,316 46,425 42,109 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reservoir minimum water area, Australia and New Zealand or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 46,508 against 4,285 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2022.
What is the difference in reservoir minimum water area between Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
42,223, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for reservoir minimum water area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Reservoir minimum water area (square kilometres). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Reservoir minimum water area. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/reservoir-minimum-water-area-square-kilometres/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/reservoir-minimum-water-area-square-kilometres/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Reservoir minimum water area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reservoir minimum water area (square kilometres)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
277 places, 6,369 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed