Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Rodenticides — Agricultural Use

Turks and Caicos Islands
0 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 t
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
78th
Zimbabwe rank
78th

Rodenticides — Agricultural Use over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Zimbabwe
01020304050199020072024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 78th of 173 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3 t 22.6 t 22.3 t Zimbabwe
2000s 0.3 t 13.4 t 13.1 t Zimbabwe
2010s 0 t 0.6 t 0.6 t Zimbabwe
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rodenticides — agricultural use, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zimbabwe?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 t against 0 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in rodenticides — agricultural use between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
0 t, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for rodenticides — agricultural use?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 78th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rodenticides — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Rodenticides — Agricultural Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/rodenticides-agricultural-use/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/rodenticides-agricultural-use/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Rodenticides — Agricultural Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rodenticides — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 7,191 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains statistics on the agricultural use of major pesticide groups and of relevant chemical families. Data are disseminated by country, with global coverage and are updated annually. The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains information on the use of major pesticide groups:1. Insecticides (Chlorinated hydrocarbons, Organo-phosphates, Carbamates-insecticides, Pyrethroids, Botanical and biological products and Others not elsewhere classified);2. Mineral Oils;3. Herbicides (Phenoxy hormone products, Triazines, Amides, Carbamates-herbicides, Dinitroanilines, Urea derivatives, Sulfonyl urea, Bipiridils, Uracil, Others not elsewhere classified);4. Fungicides and Bactericides (Inorganic, Dithiocarbamates, Benzimidazoles, Triazoles, Diazoles, Diazines, Morpholines, Others not elsewhere classified);5. Plant Growth Regulators;6. Rodenticides (Anti-coagulants, Cyanide Generators, Hypercalcaemics, Narcotics, Others not elsewhere classified);7. Other Pesticides NES (not elsewhere specified).