Brazil vs Luxembourg: Roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita
Brazil
0.2576 m3 per person
in 2024
Luxembourg
0.2886 m3 per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
34th
Luxembourg rank
31st
Roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.2886 m3 per person against 0.2576 m3 per person in Brazil, a difference of 0.031 m3 per person.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 34th and Luxembourg ranks 31st of 169 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2647 m3 per person | 0.3557 m3 per person | 0.091 m3 per person | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.2387 m3 per person | 0.4119 m3 per person | 0.1732 m3 per person | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.2438 m3 per person | 0.3018 m3 per person | 0.0581 m3 per person | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita, Brazil or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0.2886 m3 per person against 0.2576 m3 per person in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita between Brazil and Luxembourg?
- 0.031 m3 per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Luxembourg rank globally for roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 34th and Luxembourg ranks 31st of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.