Georgia vs Serbia: Roundwood, coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP
Georgia
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Georgia rank
69th
Serbia rank
66th
Roundwood, coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Georgia, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 66th of 166 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood, coniferous — production, per unit of gdp, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood, coniferous — production, per unit of gdp between Georgia and Serbia?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for roundwood, coniferous — production, per unit of gdp?
- Georgia ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 66th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood, coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood, coniferous — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.