Poland vs Zambia: Roundwood, coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP
Poland
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zambia
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Poland rank
23rd
Zambia rank
26th
Roundwood, coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Poland
- Zambia
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Zambia, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 23rd and Zambia ranks 26th of 166 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | Poland |
| 2000s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Poland |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood, coniferous — production, per unit of gdp, Poland or Zambia?
- Poland, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood, coniferous — production, per unit of gdp between Poland and Zambia?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Zambia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Poland and Zambia rank globally for roundwood, coniferous — production, per unit of gdp?
- Poland ranks 23rd and Zambia ranks 26th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood, coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood, coniferous — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.