Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zambia: Roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-28.54 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zambia
31.19 % change on previous year
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
28th
Zambia rank
31st

Roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Zambia
0200400600196219932024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 31.19 % change on previous year against -28.54 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 59.73 % change on previous year.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zambia ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 28th and Zambia ranks 31st of 30 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s -1.05 % change on previous year 400 % change on previous year 401.05 % change on previous year Zambia
1990s 5.52 % change on previous year 50.26 % change on previous year 44.74 % change on previous year Zambia
2000s -1.36 % change on previous year 64.31 % change on previous year 65.66 % change on previous year Zambia
2010s 5.23 % change on previous year 0.8158 % change on previous year 4.41 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s -10.19 % change on previous year 18.93 % change on previous year 29.11 % change on previous year Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roundwood — export quantity, annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Zambia?
Zambia, at 31.19 % change on previous year against -28.54 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in roundwood — export quantity, annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zambia?
59.73 % change on previous year, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zambia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zambia rank globally for roundwood — export quantity, annual growth rate?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 28th and Zambia ranks 31st of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zambia: Roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/roundwood-export-quantity-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/roundwood-export-quantity-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/zambia/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zambia: Roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 9,228 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Roundwood — Export quantity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.