China vs Tajikistan: Roundwood — Export quantity, per capita
China
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Tajikistan
0 m3 per person
in 2024
China rank
108th
Tajikistan rank
111th
Roundwood — Export quantity, per capita over time
- China
- Tajikistan
How they compare
China currently reports 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
That makes China's figure about 1.6 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was China ahead.
China ranks 108th and Tajikistan ranks 111th of 183 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | China |
| 2000s | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | China |
| 2010s | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | China |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood — export quantity, per capita, China or Tajikistan?
- China, at 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Tajikistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood — export quantity, per capita between China and Tajikistan?
- 0 m3 per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Tajikistan?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do China and Tajikistan rank globally for roundwood — export quantity, per capita?
- China ranks 108th and Tajikistan ranks 111th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Export quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood — Export quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.