China vs Jordan: Roundwood — Export quantity, per unit of GDP
China
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Jordan
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
116th
Jordan rank
119th
Roundwood — Export quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Jordan
How they compare
China currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Jordan, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was China ahead.
China ranks 116th and Jordan ranks 119th of 180 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood — export quantity, per unit of gdp, China or Jordan?
- China, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood — export quantity, per unit of gdp between China and Jordan?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Jordan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do China and Jordan rank globally for roundwood — export quantity, per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 116th and Jordan ranks 119th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Export quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood — Export quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.