Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Serbia and Montenegro: Roundwood — Import quantity, annual growth rate

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-11.15 % change on previous year
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
115.39 % change on previous year
in 2005
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
27th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
30th

Roundwood — Import quantity, annual growth rate over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Serbia and Montenegro
0200400600196219932024

How they compare

Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 115.39 % change on previous year against -11.15 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 126.54 % change on previous year.

That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 10.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 27th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 30th of 30 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Serbia and Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s 193.02 % change on previous year 36.07 % change on previous year 156.95 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 73.71 % change on previous year 16.49 % change on previous year 57.21 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roundwood — import quantity, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Serbia and Montenegro?
Serbia and Montenegro, at 115.39 % change on previous year against -11.15 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2005.
What is the difference in roundwood — import quantity, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Serbia and Montenegro?
126.54 % change on previous year, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Serbia and Montenegro?
13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for roundwood — import quantity, annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 27th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 30th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Import quantity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Serbia and Montenegro: Roundwood — Import quantity, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/roundwood-import-quantity-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/roundwood-import-quantity-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/serbia-and-montenegro/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Serbia and Montenegro: Roundwood — Import quantity, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roundwood — Import quantity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 10,357 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Roundwood — Import quantity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.