Japan vs Kazakhstan: Roundwood — Import quantity, per capita
Japan
0.015 m3 per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0.0111 m3 per person
in 2024
Japan rank
52nd
Kazakhstan rank
55th
Roundwood — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Japan
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.015 m3 per person against 0.0111 m3 per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0039 m3 per person.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 52nd and Kazakhstan ranks 55th of 184 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1601 m3 per person | 0.0026 m3 per person | 0.1575 m3 per person | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.085 m3 per person | 0.0075 m3 per person | 0.0775 m3 per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.0309 m3 per person | 0.0104 m3 per person | 0.0205 m3 per person | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.0181 m3 per person | 0.0092 m3 per person | 0.0088 m3 per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood — import quantity, per capita, Japan or Kazakhstan?
- Japan, at 0.015 m3 per person against 0.0111 m3 per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood — import quantity, per capita between Japan and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0039 m3 per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Kazakhstan rank globally for roundwood — import quantity, per capita?
- Japan ranks 52nd and Kazakhstan ranks 55th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.