Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Roundwood — Import quantity, per capita
Kazakhstan
0.0111 m3 per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.0135 m3 per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
55th
Namibia rank
53rd
Roundwood — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0135 m3 per person against 0.0111 m3 per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0024 m3 per person.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 55th and Namibia ranks 53rd of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0075 m3 per person | 0.0027 m3 per person | 0.0048 m3 per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.0104 m3 per person | 0.0046 m3 per person | 0.0057 m3 per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.0092 m3 per person | 0.0105 m3 per person | 0.0012 m3 per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood — import quantity, per capita, Kazakhstan or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.0135 m3 per person against 0.0111 m3 per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood — import quantity, per capita between Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 0.0024 m3 per person, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for roundwood — import quantity, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 55th and Namibia ranks 53rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.