Cambodia vs Montenegro: Roundwood — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
Cambodia
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Montenegro
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cambodia rank
74th
Montenegro rank
76th
Roundwood — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Cambodia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Montenegro, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Cambodia ranks 74th and Montenegro ranks 76th of 180 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Cambodia or Montenegro?
- Cambodia, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Cambodia and Montenegro?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Montenegro rank globally for roundwood — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Cambodia ranks 74th and Montenegro ranks 76th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.