Eswatini vs Tuvalu: Roundwood — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
Eswatini
0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tuvalu
0.0002 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eswatini rank
2nd
Tuvalu rank
1st
Roundwood — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Eswatini
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 0.0002 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 2.3 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 180 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 0.0002 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Tuvalu?
- 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tuvalu?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Tuvalu rank globally for roundwood — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Eswatini ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.